We had to write a sentence that tells the problem we’ve found and want to solve.
This exercise really made me think what actually is the problem, from all the research I’ve gathered.
This task was very effective helping me question what exactly my focus on my project will be. I found the “how might we” question especially useful, as I came to realise my design questions needed adjusting in the last step to become a more achievable and relatable solution. During this entire challenge, I had to be considerate of my users needs and how they could be improved. It really helped me to identity the key constraints the users have.
I find Johnson’s idea of the “adjacent possible” really interesting, especially in UX design. Innovation often comes from taking existing ideas or elements and using them in new ways. As a UX designer, I see how important it is to recognise and combine these “spare parts” to create something new. External UX teams, who work across different industries, have an advantage because they’re constantly exposed to new ideas. This makes it easier to spot unexpected connections that can lead to exciting and meaningful innovations.
The time it takes to make a decision increases with the number and complexity of choices.
